25
« on: December 08, 2014, 04:48:38 AM »
Having owned at least five Mark Vs and rebuilt three of them and also owned a Mark 7 I believe I know a few things about them... First of all, of all the Mark Vs I've owned/played, they have been very consistent both in action and tone. Yes, the MKV has an increased hammerthrow (Close to two inches) but they used the same hammercombs as in the late MK1 and MK2s. The plastic in the hammers of the MKV does not hold up well over time and you will get problems With hammerpins breaking Down the line. I discusses the matter With mr.MKV himself Steve Woodyard who agreed that the solution With reuse of the mk1/2 hammercombs together With the New hammers in the MKV and increased hammerthrow wasn't a very good idea and suggested to convert it to an axlerod solution. I did this in an MKV With good results using a brass axle throught the hammers and hammercombs.
As for feel of the action I find it's great and I have never had any complains about it being too slow... Even Chick Corea digs his Midi MKV and he's pretty fast... The dampers do not affect the feel o the Mark V imo. I have a Dyno My Piano Rhodes Mark II from early 1981 With wooden keys and although the keydip is shallower than on the Mark V it has an Incredible action that I like very much, almost up there With the MKV.
The Mark V is a very good piano With a flaw in the hammerdesign due to lack of testing I Guess... The MK7 hammers are identical to the MK5 hammers but the pins on the MK7 hammers are slightly bigger and do not fit into the hammercombs found on the late MK1/MK2 and MKVs...